×

Discussion Board

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    82

    QDesktopServices::openUrl vs /usr/bin/grob

    I'm looking at Inneractive's QML SDK sources and I see the following code in adinterface.cpp:

    Code:
    #elif defined(MEEGO_EDITION_HARMATTAN)
        QProcess::startDetached(QString("/usr/bin/invoker --type=m /usr/bin/grob %1").arg(adUrl.toString()));
    #else
        QDesktopServices::openUrl(adUrl);
    #endif
    Why is it not using QDesktopServices on N9? Is this just an optimization to not to launch a second copy of the browser, or what?
    Grego
    http://mpaja.com/

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    449

    Re: QDesktopServices::openUrl vs /usr/bin/grob

    Hi,

    Please see this discussion thread post. It could be one reason for choosing grob.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    82

    Re: QDesktopServices::openUrl vs /usr/bin/grob

    Well, me thinks that QDesktopServices:penUrl should start device's default browser/application for the url, which precisely already is grob on N9.
    Grego
    http://mpaja.com/

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2010-01-22, 08:16

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
×