Namespaces

Variants
Actions

Please note that as of October 24, 2014, the Nokia Developer Wiki will no longer be accepting user contributions, including new entries, edits and comments, as we begin transitioning to our new home, in the Windows Phone Development Wiki. We plan to move over the majority of the existing entries over the next few weeks. Thanks for all your past and future contributions.

Archived:Throwing any object from 'new' operator on the ARMV5 platform causes a crash (Known Issue)

From Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Archived.pngArchived: This article is archived because it is not considered relevant for third-party developers creating commercial solutions today. If you think this article is still relevant, let us know by adding the template {{ReviewForRemovalFromArchive|user=~~~~|write your reason here}}.

Article Metadata
Compatibility
Platform(s): S60 3rd Edition
S60 3rd Edition, FP1 and FP2
S60 3rd Edition FP2
S60 3rd Edition FP1
S60 3rd Edition (initial release)
Article
Created: User:Technical writer 1 (12 Jun 2008)
Last edited: hamishwillee (19 Jun 2012)

Description

Throwing bad_alloc or any object from new on the ARMV5 platform causes a crash. The problem occurs even if the user throws an object from within an overloaded new operator.

The new operators with the following signatures are affected:

 void *operator new(unsigned int aSize);
 void *operator new[](unsigned int aSize);
 

How to reproduce

The following code snippet is an example that depicts the problem:

class Dummy
{
};
 
void *operator new(unsigned int aSize)
{
void* __y = malloc(aSize);
// try to simulate a bad alloc
if (__y == 0)
{
throw Dummy(); // this will result in a crash
}
return __y;
}

Solution

To implement a user-owned overloaded version of new, it must be implemented as class specific. The other way this can be achieved is by defining new as follows:

void* operator new(size_t s, newarg) throw (std::bad_alloc)

and invoking it as:

Myclass* my = new (S60) Myclass()
This page was last modified on 19 June 2012, at 07:57.
90 page views in the last 30 days.

Was this page helpful?

Your feedback about this content is important. Let us know what you think.

 

Thank you!

We appreciate your feedback.

×